On feet, and other sexual innuedoes.

[mari4212]

Okay, if nothing else, my Religion class is going to ensure that I laugh twice a week. We tend to make reference to some sort of sexual innuendo in every class, and a new word ends up leaving us giggling. Today it was the story of Ruth, and feet have an entirely new meaning to me now. Or actually, a very old meaning that we weren't aware of before. Don't even get me started on what that now means about socks.

And I will never be able to listen to someone when they use the term "Biblical Family Values". Seriously, what family values are they talking about, Lot's daughters sleeping with him, or Issac and Jacob marrying their first cousins? Or Tamar sleeping with her father-in-law? The Bible deserves an R rating.

Comments

[lady-tigerfish.livejournal.com]

I'm not sure I follow the innuendo, but I think I do... in that case, socks are something I'm guessing that no good Catholic is allowed to wear, even if they're married, eh?

[mari4212.livejournal.com]

Well, we didn't go quite that far...It was more along the lines of saying that when Ruth uncovered Boaz's feet, she wasn't saying "Oh, look at the cute little toes!"