(no subject)
Sep. 15th, 2006 06:37 pmYou can tell there's sorting going on at H_E, because inevitiably there's private rants and musings about sorting and houses and how you fit into your house.
And here I come, jumping onto the bandwagon. Hopefully, with a slightly different take on things.
I actually wanted to talk a bit about house stereotypes, particularly Hufflepuff. We've all heard it before, 'Puffs are sweet, nice, innocent, fluffy little girls who run in terror at the snarky comments from a Slytherin. Cue everyone in Hufflepuff gagging.
And yet, aside from the last bit, I do fit the traditional stereotype. My sister jokes a lot about me being too nice for my own good, and I really am. I hate causing drama and upset, and if you ask me to do something, I bend over backwards for you. So for me there's always a dichotomy, between arguing against the fanon stereotype seen in applications and acknowledging the fact that for me most of it is true.
People see me on the street and on campus, and they typically slot me down into the "little and cute, sweet girl" niche.
It has it's advantages at times. One, I really am like that most of the time, so it's not exactly a false assumption. And people tend to cut me a little slack, they assume I had good intentions and accept it when I make mistakes.
But then there are the times when I do get taken advantage of, and I don't always realize that someone has done it until later. And then I feel horribly betrayed and the other person will sometimes lose my respect and loyalty. (Hey, I'm the hufflepuff stereotype, but I'm still a badger, not a carpet. Loyalty's big for me, you betray it, it'll take a long time before I trust you again.)
This didn't turn out nearly as relevant to what others have been talking about today as I thought it would be, but it did help to settle things in my mind.
Opinions, anyone?
And here I come, jumping onto the bandwagon. Hopefully, with a slightly different take on things.
I actually wanted to talk a bit about house stereotypes, particularly Hufflepuff. We've all heard it before, 'Puffs are sweet, nice, innocent, fluffy little girls who run in terror at the snarky comments from a Slytherin. Cue everyone in Hufflepuff gagging.
And yet, aside from the last bit, I do fit the traditional stereotype. My sister jokes a lot about me being too nice for my own good, and I really am. I hate causing drama and upset, and if you ask me to do something, I bend over backwards for you. So for me there's always a dichotomy, between arguing against the fanon stereotype seen in applications and acknowledging the fact that for me most of it is true.
People see me on the street and on campus, and they typically slot me down into the "little and cute, sweet girl" niche.
It has it's advantages at times. One, I really am like that most of the time, so it's not exactly a false assumption. And people tend to cut me a little slack, they assume I had good intentions and accept it when I make mistakes.
But then there are the times when I do get taken advantage of, and I don't always realize that someone has done it until later. And then I feel horribly betrayed and the other person will sometimes lose my respect and loyalty. (Hey, I'm the hufflepuff stereotype, but I'm still a badger, not a carpet. Loyalty's big for me, you betray it, it'll take a long time before I trust you again.)
This didn't turn out nearly as relevant to what others have been talking about today as I thought it would be, but it did help to settle things in my mind.
Opinions, anyone?
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 12:25 am (UTC)What is funny about this is that it's PURELY on appearances. I get the same thing, and I don't fit the niche at all. It's just because I look young and I have big blue eyes. When I wear my glasses, people also think I look intelligent.
Then I start talking and they think I'm a heinous bitch. XD At least for awhile.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 12:55 am (UTC)No major discussions in the Eagle common room, just in the journals of friends of the dortee. There's three or four applications up right now which are borderline squibs. My complaint with the process is that some people get in because they so well fit one house that they can get 52% votes from one house, and 48% squibs, but still get in. Most often to Hufflepuff, because a weak Puff will still be liked by the community. In contrast, a Slytherdor with some claw tendencies and maybe a Slytherpush will get 1/3 Squib votes, with the rest distributed between three houses, and not get in.
It goes back to the squib description I put in my application - many truly interesting people will sort into multiple houses, not just one. You are the stereotypical badger, but you also have the brains and intellectual curiosity to be a Ravenclaw, and the courage of your convictions to be a Gryffindor. Too many people view complexity of character as an excuse to squib.
On the other hand, it can be hard to separate a push from the real thing.
Fortunately our two claws are being voted into our house overwhelmingly.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 01:21 am (UTC)I've never seen a 'puff-slytherin though. I don't think that could work.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 01:29 am (UTC)I fit into the Hufflepuff stereotype. Motivated, willing to work for what I want, and loyal. I'll bend over backwards for friends.
I have glasses, like university, like helping people. I've been decribed as cute, caring, sweet...
But what they seem to see when they don't look past the stereotype is the fact that most 'puffs are fierce when someone hurts them, or their friends. We're nice, but we're no doormats. We would stand up to the nastiest of Slytherins if we knew we were making a difference (but we don't go looking for trouble, or make a scene when it's not going to change things).
At least I'm seeing some people take our side when a person applies for sorting with a comment saying "I don't think I belong in Hufflepuff, 'cause I'm not shy/quiet/boring/nice to everyone", just like I'll defend Slytherin when an applicant says "I'm not cruel/don't like dark arts/not evil so I don't belong in Slytherin"
*sigh*
Slytherin and Hufflepuff seem to be the most misunderstood houses...
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 10:42 pm (UTC)And yes, that's exactly what they miss about Hufflepuff. They dismiss us as only being nice, and miss our not-so-cuddly badger side.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 04:39 am (UTC)Usually I think of Hufflepuff as grounded, balanced, willing to put in effort, easy-going until poked with sticks... and yes, generally nice.
Interestingly, I've been wanting to write about Ravenclaw lately. At the moment it's not quite put-together enough in my mind, though.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 06:21 am (UTC)I don't think we can discount the "reading the same thing over and over" syndrome. If someone's already a little irritated for the above reasons (or irritated at any other pet peeve that pops up frequently), they're likely to get more critical of it the more they see it. I've even noticed in myself that if I sort more than two or three apps in a sitting, I get increasingly critical as I go on.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 11:50 pm (UTC)There's a delightful future badger on the way over to friend you, named
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 10:31 pm (UTC)And I've stuck it in my memories so that I can find it for easy referencing later.
Yeah, this week has been wank-capital. And none of it has made fandom_wank yet.